Source: Adapted from publicly available content on https://www.ieltspodcast.com/ (Ben Worthington). This is an original, condensed summary — not a copy of their site.

Speaking is scored on four equally weighted criteria — fluency & coherence, lexical resource, grammatical range & accuracy, and pronunciation. There's no "task achievement" score here the way there is in writing, which changes your strategy more than most candidates realize: silence costs you far more than an imperfect or incomplete answer ever will.


Before you speak a word: greeting the examiner

First impressions set the tone for the whole test, and a few small politeness habits read as fluency to the examiner:

Part 1 (about 5 minutes, ~12 short questions)

You'll get roughly 20 seconds per question including the examiner asking it — enough for about four connected ideas, not a monologue. The examiner is listening for:

Criterion What's actually being checked
Fluency Keep talking without long pauses; can you rephrase or backtrack smoothly
Vocabulary Range of general + topic words, natural word combinations (collocations)
Grammar Range of tenses/structures — answering everything in present tense caps your score
Pronunciation Clear individual sounds and natural rising/falling intonation — an accent is fine as long as you're easily understood

Topics rotate through familiar categories: the arts, education, communication, technology, free time, styles/tastes, relationships, environment. Prepare vocabulary for what, where, why, when, who, how long on the work/study/home question — it's asked almost every time and shapes how the examiner perceives you for the remainder of Part 1.

Troubleshooting phrases that don't cost you points: - Didn't hear the question: "Sorry, would you mind saying that again?" - Caught your own mistake mid-sentence: correcting yourself is a positive signal — self-correction is explicitly rewarded, as long as you don't do it constantly. - Need a second to think: "That's not something I get asked often, let me think about it for a moment." Don't overuse memorized fillers — it can sound rehearsed rather than natural.

Part 2 (the cue card, ~2 minutes after 1 minute of prep)

The single most common mistake: trying to write your full answer word-for-word in the one-minute prep window, then freezing when you run out of written material. Silence gets you nothing in IELTS speaking.

Instead, write 5–6 words or short phrases — but make them count. "Nice" and "fun" are Band 5 words. Write words that actually impress: charismatic, well-respected, a positive role model, entrepreneurial skill — then expand each one live into a full sentence with detail as you speak.

Read the cue card as three parts, and know that the third is the hardest: 1. The topic itself (who/what/where — general, personal to you, no expert knowledge required). 2. The descriptive bullet points (who, when, what — these want detail, not a bare one-line answer). 3. The final "how/why" bullet — you should be spending the largest share of your two minutes here, because explaining is genuinely harder than describing, and it's rewarded accordingly.

You do not have to answer every bullet point if you have a strong story — there's no task-achievement score here, so a well-developed answer covering the main topic and the final "why/how" is fine even if a minor bullet gets skipped.

A concrete tip for extending a Part 2 answer that's running short: add a sentence about the future, and a sentence giving advice using present simple. "Going forward, I'd like to volunteer somewhere similar again, since it taught me a lot about working with people," or "If someone else were in my position, I'd tell them to..." — this also boosts your grammatical range score by shifting tense deliberately.

Part 3 (4–5 minutes, the most demanding section)

The examiner asks broader, more abstract questions related to your Part 2 topic. A reliable three-step answer structure:

  1. State your opinion, ideally paraphrasing rather than repeating the question wording: "I'd say online shopping has completely reshaped how people in my country buy everyday goods."
  2. Give a reason.
  3. Give a specific example to back it up.

For advantages/disadvantages questions, run the same pattern per side: state the point → explain why it's an advantage/disadvantage → example. Useful framing phrases: "One of the main advantages of X is... Another positive aspect is... One key drawback is..."

Quick Part 3 tips: - If a question is genuinely hard: "I'm not quite sure if that's exactly what you're thinking about, but I think..." — a rehearsed but natural-sounding bridge phrase for the moments your mind goes blank. - If a specific word won't come to you, describe it instead of stopping ("the method used to test ability" for "exam") — this keeps you talking, which is what's actually being scored. - Learn fixed word combinations like bear in mind, take into account — they sound native and reduce your error rate, but only use collocations you've practiced in context.

Idioms and "thinking time" phrases

Idioms and collocations aren't required, but natural, correctly-used ones separate an intermediate answer from a fluent one. A few worth knowing (use sparingly — overuse sounds scripted):

Idiom Meaning
Fresh as a daisy Lively and clean-feeling despite tiredness
Couch potato Someone who spends too much time on screens
Full of beans Lively, energetic
A bad egg An untrustworthy person
Down to earth Practical, realistic
Eager beaver Hardworking, enthusiastic
Ball in your court It's your decision now
Throw in the towel Give up
Get a second wind Regain energy after tiring
Jump the gun Act too early
On the ball Alert and capable
Put all your eggs in one basket Risk everything on one thing

Phrases that buy you thinking time while sounding natural rather than hesitant: "If I remember correctly, it was..." / "Let me think about how best to put this..." / "I guess you could say..." / "That's an angle I haven't really considered before, but..."

Pronunciation at Band 9

The examiner listens for three layers, and "precision and subtlety" means all three working together, not just accurate sounds in isolation:

  1. Individual sounds — vowels, diphthongs, consonants pronounced distinctly enough that words like ship/sheep or van/fan don't collapse into each other.
  2. Word and sentence stress. Word stress can change meaning entirely (PROtest the noun vs. proTEST the verb). Sentence stress lets you underline the exact idea you want the examiner to notice: "Being bilingual will help extend your networking opportunities WORLDWIDE" lands differently than a flat reading of the same sentence.
  3. Intonation — the rise and fall that conveys mood and signals new information. Most statements end in a falling tone; a rising tone on a word draws attention to it. Being relaxed and speaking your actual thoughts naturally produces the right melody — tension flattens your intonation into something monotone, which reads as lower-band pronunciation even with accurate individual sounds.

Advanced grammar for a higher band: inversion and cleft sentences

Inversion (verb before subject) adds emphasis and is a legitimate way to show range. It's triggered by negative adverbs — never, rarely, hardly, seldom, only then, on no account, no sooner — placed at the front of the sentence, with subject and verb (or auxiliary) swapped:

I have rarely seen such enthusiasm.Rarely have I seen such enthusiasm. I only realised the mistake afterwards.Only afterwards did I realise the mistake.

Cleft (emphatic) sentences front-load the thing you want emphasized using a "what/the reason/the place/the thing" clause plus the verb "be":

I really value spending time outdoors.What I really value is spending time outdoors. The reason (why) I chose this career is the flexibility it offers. The moment I felt most proud was finishing my first marathon.

Both structures slot naturally into Part 1 opinion questions, Part 2 cue-card answers, and Part 3 abstract discussion — and both signal to the examiner that you can manipulate word order deliberately, not just string simple sentences together.

Fluency and cohesion: connectives vs. discourse markers

Band 7 fluency & coherence specifically requires "a range of connectives and discourse markers with some flexibility" — meaning more than repeating "and," "but," and "in my opinion" throughout the test.

Connectives link the logic between ideas:

Function Examples
Addition also, besides, furthermore, moreover
Comparison like, similarly, in the same way
Contrast however, on the other hand, nevertheless
Order first, next, finally, gradually
Result as a result, consequently, therefore
Example/emphasis for example, especially, to illustrate
Summary in short, on the whole, as I've said

Discourse markers manage the conversation itself rather than the logic:

Function Examples
Buying thinking time Well...
Prefacing your real view Actually, I have to say...
Admitting something I must admit...
Rephrasing What I mean is... / In other words...
Introducing opinion My point is... / I guess...
Shared knowledge with listener You know... / You see...

A natural answer mixes both without repeating any single one — that variety, not the presence of any specific word, is what the band descriptor is actually rewarding.

General ways to raise your speaking score