# ielts-academic-writing-sample-tasks-2023

- **Original Source:** `ielts-academic-writing-sample-tasks-2023.pdf`
- **Category:** `writing`
- **Original Format:** `.pdf`

---

 
 
 
 
 
Page 1 of 26 
IELTS is jointly owned by the British Council; IDP IELTS; and 
Cambridge University Press & Assessment 
 
IELTS.org 
 
IELTS Academic Writing 
Sample Tasks 
The IELTS Academic Writing test includes a variety of tasks.  
 
In Task 1, test takers are asked to describe some visual information 
(graph/table/chart/diagram) in their own words. They need to write at least 150 words in 
about 20 minutes.  
 
In Task 2, they respond to a point of view or argument or problem. They need to write at least 
250 words in about 40 minutes. 
 
Read the details of each task type on our Test format page. 

 
 
Page 2 of 26     IELTS.org 
Contents 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 1A ................................................................ ................ 3 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 1B ................................................................ ................ 4 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 1C ................................................................ ................ 5 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 2A ................................................................ ................ 6 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 2B ................................................................ ................ 7 
 
Sample Candidate Writing Scripts and Examiner Comments ................................ ....... 8 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 1A – Sample Script A ................................ ................. 9 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 1A – Sample Script B ................................ ............... 10 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 1B – Sample Script A ................................ ............... 11 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 1B – Sample Script B ................................ ............... 12 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 1C – Sample Script A ................................ ............... 13 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 1C – Sample Script B ................................ ............... 14 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 1C – Sample Script C ................................ ............... 16 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 2A – Sample Script A ................................ ............... 18 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 2A – Sample Script B ................................ ............... 19 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 2A – Sample Script C ................................ ............... 21 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 2B – Sample Script A ................................ ............... 23 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 2B – Sample Script B ................................ ............... 25 
 
  

 
 
Page 3 of 26     IELTS.org 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 1A 
 
WRITING TASK 1 
 
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 
 
 
Write at least 150 words. 
 
 
 
 
The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in 
Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. 
 
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and 
make comparisons where relevant. 

 
 
Page 4 of 26     IELTS.org 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 1B 
 
 
WRITING TASK 1 
 
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 
 
 
 
 
Write at least 150 words. 
 
 
 
The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992. 
 
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make 
comparisons where relevant. 

 
 
Page 5 of 26     IELTS.org 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 1C 
 
 
WRITING TASK 1 
 
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 
 
 
 
 
Write at least 150 words. 
 
 
 
 
The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the 
building industry. 
 
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make 
comparisons where relevant. 

 
 
Page 6 of 26     IELTS.org 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 2A 
 
 
WRITING TASK 2 
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. 
Write about the following topic: 
 
 
 
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your 
own knowledge or experience. 
 
Write at least 250 words. 
 
Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amounts of money are 
better prepared to deal with the problems of adult life than children brought up by 
wealthy parents. 
 
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 

 
 
Page 7 of 26     IELTS.org 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 2B 
 
 
WRITING TASK 2 
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. 
Write about the following topic: 
 
 
 
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your 
own knowledge or experience. 
 
Write at least 250 words. 
 
International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places. At the same time, 
there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment. 
 
Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages? 

 
 
Page 8 of 26     
IELTS.org 
 
Sample Candidate Writing Scripts and Examiner 
Comments 
 
Both the Academic and General Training Writing   
Modules consist of two tasks, Task 1 and Task 2. 
Each task is assessed independently. The 
assessment of Task 2 carries more weight in 
marking than Task 1. 
Detailed performance descriptors have been 
developed which describe written performance at 
the 9 IELTS bands. These descriptors apply to 
both the Academic and General Training 
Modules. 
 
Task 1 responses are assessed on the following 
criteria: 
• Task Achievement 
• Coherence and Cohesion 
• Lexical Resource 
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy 
 
Task 2 responses are assessed on the following 
criteria: 
• Task Response 
• Coherence and Cohesion 
• Lexical Resource 
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy 
 
Candidates should note that responses will be 
penalised if they are a) partly or wholly 
plagiarised, b) not written as full, connected text 
(e.g. using bullet points in any part of the 
response, or note form, is not appropriate). 
Task 1 
Task Achievement 
This criterion assesses how fully, appropriately, 
accurately and relevantly the response fulfils the 
requirements set out in the task, using the 
minimum of 150 words. 
Task 1 Academic is a writing task which has a 
defined input and a largely predictable output. It is 
basically an information-transfer task, which 
relates narrowly to the factual content of a 
diagram, graph, table, chart, map or other visual 
input, not to speculative explanations that lie 
outside the given data. 
Coherence and Cohesion 
This criterion is concerned with the overall 
organisation and logical development of the 
message: how the response organises and links 
information, ideas and language.  
 
 
Coherence refers to the linking of ideas 
through logical sequencing, while cohesion 
refers to the varied and appropriate use of 
cohesive devices (e.g. logical connectors, 
conjunctions and pronouns) to assist in 
making clear the relationships between and 
within sentences. 
Lexical Resource 
This criterion refers to the range of vocabulary 
the candidate has used and the accuracy and 
appropriacy of that use in terms of the specific 
task. 
Grammatical Range and Accuracy 
This criterion refers to the range and accurate 
use of the candidate’s grammatical resource 
within the candidate’s writing at sentence level. 
 
Task 2 
Task Response 
Both the Academic and General Training 
Writing Task 2 require the candidates to 
formulate and develop a position in relation to 
a given prompt in the form of a question or 
statement, using a minimum of 250 words. 
Ideas should be supported by evidence, and 
examples may be drawn from a candidate’s 
own experience.  
The other criteria for Task 2 are the same as 
for Task 1 (Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical 
Resource, Grammatical Range and Accuracy). 
 
Writing responses are marked by trained and 
certificated IELTS examiners. Scores may be 
reported as whole bands or half-bands. 
On the next 17 pages you will find candidates’ 
answers to five sample Writing tasks. There 
are answers for each Writing task. Each 
answer has been awarded a band score and 
is accompanied by an examiner comment on 
the candidate’s performance for that task. 
The examiners’ guidelines for marking the 
Writing scripts are very detailed. There are 
many different ways a candidate may 
achieve a particular band score. The 
candidates’ answers that follow should not 
be regarded as definitive examples of any 
particular band score. 
Please refer to the publicly available IELTS 
Writing Key Criteria on our website. 

 
 
Page 9 of 26     IELTS.org 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 1A – Sample  
Script A 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Examiner comment  
Band 5 
There is a good attempt to describe the overall trends but the content would have been greatly  
improved if the candidate had included some reference to the figures given on the graph. Without 
these, the reader is lacking some important information.  The answer is quite difficult to follow and 
there are some punctuation errors that cause confusion. The structures are fairly simple and efforts 
to produce more complex sentences are not successful. 


 
 
Page 10 of 26     IELTS.org 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 1A – Sample  
Script B 
 
 
 
Examiner comment  
Band 6 
The candidate has made a good attempt to describe the graphs looking at global trends and more 
detailed figures. There is, however, some information missing and the information is  inaccurate in 
minor areas. The answer flows quite smoothly although connectives are overused or inappropriate, 
and some of the points do not link up well. The grammatical accuracy is quite good and the 
language used to describe the trends is well-handled. However, there are problems with expression 
and the appropriate choice of wo rds and whilst there is good structural control, the complexity and 
variation in the sentences are limited. 
  


 
 
Page 11 of 26     IELTS.org 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 1B – Sample  
Script A 
 
 
 
 
 
Examiner comment  
Band 6 
The answer has an appropriate introduction which the candidate has attempted to express in their 
own words. There is good coverage of the data and a brief reference to contrasting trends. The 
answer can be followed although it is rather repetitive and cohe sive devices are overused. In order 
to gain a higher mark for content, the candidate would be expected to summarise the most important 
features of the graph in an overview, for example, ‘audiences for radio peak in the morning, and for 
TV, in the evening’. There is some flexibility and precision in the range of vocabulary used. Sentences 
are long but do lack complexity. To score more highly there would be fewer errors in tense, verb form 
and spelling which interfere slightly with the flow of the answer. 
 


 
 
Page 12 of 26     IELTS.org 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 1B – Sample  
Script B 
 
 
 
 
Examiner comment  
Band 7 
The answer deals well with both the individual media trends and the overall comparison of these trends. 
The opening could be more fully developed with the inclusion of information relating to the groups 
studied and the period of time during which the study took place. There is a good variety of cohesive 
devices and the message can be followed quite easily although the expression is sometimes a little 
clumsy. Structures are complex and vocabulary is varied but there are errors in word forms, tense and 
voice though these do not impede communication. 


 
 
Page 13 of 26     IELTS.org 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 1C – Sample  
Script A 
 
 
 
 
Examiner comment  
Band 5 
Although the basic process is accurately described, this script fails to present an overview and some 
of the key features are not adequately covered. The first sentence may have been an attempt at an 
overview but it simply causes confusion and detracts fro m the answer. Despite this, the overall 
progression is clear and there is effective, though mechanical, use of linkers and sequencers. There 
are also examples of substitution and referencing, although sentences are not always well linked. 
The vocabulary is  minimally adequate for the task. Spelling is generally accurate but there are 
inappropriate word choices, omissions and errors in word form. Some attempts at subordination and 
complex nominalisations are made, but generally the structures are limited and there are frequent 
errors. Overall this is a good example of a Band 5 performance. 


 
 
Page 14 of 26     IELTS.org 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 1C – Sample  
Script B 
 
 
 


 
 
Page 15 of 26     IELTS.org 
Examiner comment  
Band 7 
This test taker uses an inappropriate format at times (e.g.  the letter -style opening and personal 
comments) and this limits the band for Task Achievement. The process itself is adequately described, 
although some irrelevant information is included and there is no clear overview. Information is 
logically organised and there is a clear progression throughout the response. A range of cohesive 
devices is used appropriately, although there are occasional errors in referencing and linking, and 
paragraphing would have helped convey a clearer description of the stages. A w ide range of 
sophisticated lexis is used to convey meaning with precision, but there are also occasional flaws in 
word choice that lead to some slightly awkward expressions. A wide range of structures is also used 
fluently with only occasional slight error  and the majority of sentences are error -free. In spite of the 
high level of language proficiency, the flaws in format and organisation limit the rating for this 
response to Band 7.  

 
 
Page 16 of 26     IELTS.org 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 1C – Sample  
Script C 
 
 


 
 
Page 17 of 26     IELTS.org 
Examiner comment  
Band 8.5 
This response fully satisfies the requirements of the task. All key features of each stage of the process 
are appropriately and accurately presented. There is an overview in the first paragraph indicating that 
there are ‘seven consecutive steps’ however for the highest score, a fuller overview would be needed, to 
summarise those key stages, for example; extracting the clay, then shaping, drying and delivering the 
bricks. The message is very easy to read with seamless cohesion. Paragraphing, linking and refe rencing 
are all skilfully managed. The language used is very fluent and sophisticated. A wide range of 
vocabulary and structures are used with full flexibility and accuracy within the scope of this task. Only 
rare minor errors can be found and these do not detract from communication or the high rating. This 
item is a good example of a very high-level response.  

 
 
Page 18 of 26     IELTS.org 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 2A – Sample 
Script A 
 
 
 
 
Examiner comment  
Band 4 
While it is obviously related to the topic, the introduction is confusing and the test taker’s position is  
difficult to identify. Ideas are limited and although the test taker attempts to support them with 
examples from experience, they remain unclear. There is no overall progression in the response and 
the ideas are not coherently linked. Although cohesive devices are used, they assist only minimally 
in achieving coherence. The range of vocabulary is basic and control is inadequate for the task.  
Language from the input material is used inappropriately and frequent errors in word choice and 
collocation cause severe problems for the reader. Similarly, the range of structures is very limited, 
the density of grammatical and punctuation error is high and these features cause some difficulty for 
the reader. Attempts to use complex structures, such as subordination, are rare and tend to be very 
inaccurate. 
  


 
 
Page 19 of 26     IELTS.org 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 2A – Sample  
Script B 
 
 
 


 
 
Page 20 of 26     IELTS.org 
 
 
Examiner comment  
Band 6.5 
The arguments in this response are generally well developed, ideas are appropriate and there is a clear 
position. (It is a shame that the first paragraph, and beginning of the second are mainly copied from the 
rubric.) Better use of paragraphing would have allowed a clearer focus to some of the supporting points 
and prevented the lapse into generalisation towards the end. Nevertheless, there is a generally clear 
progression with a good arrangement of opposing arguments. Referencing is usually accurate and 
effective, but better use of linkers would have improved the cohesion. Vocabulary is varied and used 
with some flexibility. The choice is not always precise but the test taker can evidently incorporate less 
common/idiomatic phrases into the argument and there is a good range that is generally accurate. The 
repetition of language from the rubric, while integrated, reveals a lack of ability to paraphrase. Regular 
errors detract from the use of a range of structures, although they do not detract from overall cl arity. This 
is a generally good response to the task, but the weaknesses in organisation and grammatical control 
limit the rating to Band 6.5. 


 
 
Page 21 of 26     IELTS.org 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 2A – Sample  
Script C 
 
 
  


 
 
Page 22 of 26     IELTS.org 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Examiner comment  
Band 8.5 
The topic is very well addressed and explored in depth. The position is clear throughout and directly 
answers the question. The ideas presented are relevant and very well supported, apart from some 
over-generalisation in the penultimate paragraph. However, there is no mention of how well children 
from ‘wealthy parents’ deal with problems. Although this is not a requirement, it could be added to 
further improve the response. The ideas and information are very well organised and paragraphing is 
used appropriately throughout. The answer can be read with ease due to the sophisticated handling 
of cohesive devices, with only minimal lapses (for example, the use of ‘e.g.’). The writer uses a wide 
and very natural range of vocabulary with full flexibility. There are many examples of appropriate 
modification, collocation and precise vocabulary choice. Syntax is equally varied and sophisticated. 
There are only occasional errors in an otherwise very accurate answer. Overall this is a very strong 
performance and a good example of Band 8.5. 
 


 
 
Page 23 of 26     IELTS.org 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 2B – Sample  
Script A 
 
 
 
  


 
 
Page 24 of 26     IELTS.org 
 
Examiner comment  
Band 5.5 
The first five lines of this response are directly copied rubric; no credit is given for copied rubric.  
The topic is addressed and a relevant position is expressed, although there are patches (as in the 
fourth paragraph) where the development is unclear. Other ideas are more evidently relevant, but are 
sometimes insufficiently developed. In spite of this, ideas are clearly organised and there is an overall 
progression within the response. There is some effective use of a range of cohesive devices, 
including referencing, but there is also some mechanical use of linkers in places. Paragraphs are 
sometimes rather too short and inappropriate. A range of vocabulary is attempted and this is 
adequate for a good response to the task. However, control is weak and there are frequent spelling 
errors that can cause some difficulties for the reader, thus keeping the rating down for the lexical 
criterion. The test taker uses a mix of simple and complex structures with frequent subordinate 
clauses. Control of complex structures is variable, and although errors are noticeable they only rarely 
impede communication. Although there are some features of a higher band in this response, flaws in 
the paragraphing and the errors in vocabulary limit this rating to Band 5.5. 
 

 
 
Page 25 of 26     IELTS.org 
Academic Writing Sample Task – 2B – Sample  
Script B 
 
 


 
 
Page 26 of 26     IELTS.org 
 
 
 
Examiner comment  
Band 7.5 
The test taker addresses both aspects of the task and presents a clear position throughout the 
response. Ideas are relevant, well extended and supported, although there are occasional lapses in 
content (as in the opening of paragraph 2 and the tendency to ‘present solutions to the 
disadvantages’ in paragraph 3). However, ideas are logically organised and the re is a clear 
progression. A range of cohesive devices is used effectively, but some under-use of connectives and 
substitution and some lapses in the use of referencing are noticeable. A wide range of vocabulary is 
used flexibly. The test taker can convey precise meanings, and although awkward expressions or 
inappropriacies in word choice occur, these are only occasional and do not limit the rating for this 
criterion. Likewise, a good range of sentence structures is used with a high level of accuracy 
resulting in frequent error-free sentences. Minor systematic errors persist, however, and punctuation 
is unhelpful at times. The strength of the appropriate response to the task, and the lexical resource in 
particular, mean overall this response is a good example of Band 7.5. 
 
 



